Rove: liberals want troops to die

June 24, 2005

The SP Times blasts Karl Rove and the White House today for Rove’s nasty speech in NYC this week.

Before an audience of cheering conservatives this week, Karl Rove lambasted liberals for their “moderation and restraint” in response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. “Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 in the attacks and prepared for war,” Rove said. “Liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers.”

What a despicable smear coming from the political right hand of the president of the United States. Democrats are demanding that Rove apologize or resign, but the White House defended his remarks and – get this – accused Rove’s critics of engaging in partisan attacks. Only last week Rove was demanding that Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., apologize for comparing U.S. treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay to the methods of Nazis, Stalin and Pol Pot. Durbin apologized. But Rove is hanging tough.

The Times gets it partially right: Rove’s remarks were outrageous, and the double standards applied to this and the Durbin case are hypocritical, to say the least. Of course, Durbin was right. He apologized anyway, which just energized his detractors, and they continue to tenaciously attack him. This crowd sees an apology simply as a sign of weakness.

But the Times, like many other news outlets, is ignoring the most outrageous of Rove’s remarks. Rove said that liberals strive to kill American troops. Not that liberals fail to support the troops or even that liberal policies would put them in danger, but that liberals want harm to come to American soldiers.

“Has there ever been a more revealing moment this year?” Mr. Rove asked. “Let me just put this in fairly simple terms: Al Jazeera now broadcasts the words of Senator Durbin to the Mideast, certainly putting our troops in greater danger. No more needs to be said about the motives of liberals.”

The motives of liberals are to put our troops in greater danger. That’s what he said, and that’s what the White House is defending. They planned this offensive to distract from W’s plummeting poll numbers, the Downing Street Memo and the rest of the increasingly bad news emerging from Iraq.

If these vicious clowns had simply dedicated the same energy and forethought to fighting terror, our troops would be safe at home right now celebrating the capture and trial of Osama rather than being sucked deeper and deeper into the Mesopotamian morass.

Now the White Hosue is trying to brush off the controversy as simply philosophical differences. Here’s a philosophic reality check.

Believe capturing the person primarily responsible for the attack should be a top priority.

It’s been four years, and Osama bin Laden is still free, even though Bush’s CIA chief says he knows where he is.

Investigate the intelligence failures that led to 9/11.

Do everything in their power to block the 9/11 Commission from doing its work.

Propose creating the Department of Homeland Security.

Push tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.

Believe we should have stayed the course in Afghanistan, not allowing the Taliban to resurge, the warlords to take power, and the opium trade to skyrocket.

Ignore Afghanistan as the situation worsens.

Believe that we should be honest with our troops about the reasons we go to war, give them everything they need to be safe, and make sure we go in with an exit plan.

Manipulate intelligence to trump up reasons to go to war, don’t give our troops the support they need, constantly mislead the public about the direction the war is going, and fail to make an exit plan. And turn Iraq into the ultimate terrorist training ground.

Comments are closed.



  • September 2019
    M T W T F S S
    « Oct